표 4. | Table 4. 지역별 및 연령별 PWC 이원변량분석 결과 | Two-way ANOVA results of PWC by region and age

Source	Type III Sum of Squares	df	M Square	F	Sig.	Post-hoc
Corrected Model	20.467(a)	31	.660	27.379	.000
Intercept	326.239	1	326.239	13,528.683	.000
Region	.178	3	.059	2.463	.062
Age	18.441	7	2.634	109.246***	.000	***A, B< C, D, E, F, G, H***C, D, E<F, G, H
Region× age	.844	21	.040	1.667*	.032	A: * GS<SGB: * JL, CC <SG
Error	14.155	588	.024
Total	433.379	620
Corrected total	34.623	619

A=2;6–2;11, B=3;0–3;5, C=3;6–3;11, D=4;0–4;5, E=4;6–4;11, F=5;0–, G=6;0–6;11, H=7;0–7;11.
p<05,
p<.01,
p<.001.
PWC, proportion of whole-word correctness; JL, Jeolla; SG, Seoul & Gyeonggi; GS, Gyeongsang; CC, Chungcheong.